controversial law in calif now in effect whos fighting it

More smart ideas come from experts outside government. Platforms would also have to create complaint systems that notify users within 14 days of taking down their content and provide for appeals. The bill would amend Section 230 to give larger platforms just 24 hours to remove content determined by a court to be unlawful. A bill cosponsored by Senators John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, and Brian Schatz, a Hawaii Democrat, would require internet companies to explain their content moderation policies to users and provide detailed quarterly statistics on which items were removed, down-ranked, or demonetized. Several more nuanced, bipartisan reform proposals do contain ingredients worth considering. He has said nothing publicly in the intervening months indicating that he has altered this position. “It is propagating falsehoods they know to be false.”īiden’s mistake, though, is urging revocation of Section 230 to punish Facebook, when what he really seems to want is for the company to police political advertising.

The law “should be revoked because is not merely an internet company,” he said.

In a December 2019 conversation with the New York Times editorial board, Biden responded to questions about Section 230 with pique at Facebook for failing to fact-check inaccurate Trump campaign ads about him. This is Biden’s position: that by providing a shield against litigation, the law creates a disincentive for companies to remove harmful content. Other skeptics say Section 230 allows platforms to profit from hosting misinformation and hate speech.

In fact, there’s scant evidence of systematic anti-right bias by social-media platforms, according to two analyses by The Economist and a third by a researcher at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. In the face of a three-year drought, new California laws require water districts and other local entities to develop plans to manage their groundwater and allow the state to intervene if necessary.Meanwhile, Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, has introduced legislation that would encourage individuals to sue platforms for making content decisions in “bad faith”-an unsubtle invitation to conservatives who feel they’ve been the targets of politically motivated slights. Gas wholesalers are expected to spend more on permits and pass along their increased costs to drivers at the pump as part of a new program that caps the amount of pollutant that can be emitted by companies, with the allocated limit sold to firms in the form of emission permits.Ī 'yes means yes' standard for sex between college students takes effect, requiring 'an affirmative, conscious and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity,' meaning silence or a lack of resistance can no longer be deemed consent. Arnold Schwarzenegger that extends the space requirements for egg-laying hens to out-of-state suppliers. The Humane Society of the United States says the law goes further than any in the country when coupled with a law signed by former Gov. Here's a look at some pieces of legislation that become the law of the land this week:Ī ballot initiative approved by voters in 2008 takes effect restricting the confinement of egg-laying hens, breeding sows and veal calves. As the Calendar turns, several new laws go into effect in California, including some that have been politically divisive in the Golden state.

Controversial law in calif now in effect whos fighting it